Maternity leave for surrogate mothers-
the boon and the bane
Dr G P Naik
Email naik@talentavenues.com
Phone 09243470110
The Delhi High
Court on 29th Jan 2016 ruled in the case of a central government
employee that surrogate mothers who have children through surrogacy are
entitled to maternity leave which includes pre- and post-natal period. A
similar judgement was delivered by the High Court of Kerala in respect of a
state government employee on 6th January 2015.
The earlier rulings of various courts have extended the
maternity leave also to working women adopting the child. Therefore now there
are three categories of working women eligible for maternity leave namely (1)
woman delivering the child after becoming pregnant (2) woman adopting the child
of some other woman and (3) woman engaging some other woman to carry her
pregnancy, deliver the child and handover the child to her.
Legal aspects
Working women are eligible for 12 weeks (84 days) of
maternity leave for child birth under ESI Act 1948 (payable by ESIC) or under
Maternity Benefits Act
(payable by employer) as the case may be. The government
employees are eligible for up to six months maternity leave under service rules
applicable to them. Maternity leave is with full pay. Law makers then, had no
inkling that courts will go to the extent of including child adoption and
surrogacy for maternity benefit.
Purpose of maternity
leave
The primary purpose of maternity leave is to protect the
working women from health hazards arising out of pregnancy and child delivery.
That is why half of the maternity leave is allowed to be availed before
delivery and remaining half to be availed post delivery.
But unfortunately the courts in extending the benefit of
maternity leave have ignored the importance of real women who deliver the baby
for adoption or who share their womb for surrogacy. The courts, no doubt have
delivered justice to one category of working women capable of attaining
alternative motherhood without answering large many number of questions.
Who is a surrogate
mother?
Surrogate mother is the one who carries in her womb, the
progeny of another woman, delivers the baby only to be handed over to the woman
who wants to attain alternative motherhood. In the process this hapless woman
makes a supreme service to mankind by risking her health and aborting her
motherhood feelings.
Unfortunately society has failed to call her as mother, rather she is called as surrogate
woman and the other woman who receives the baby without delivering it, is
called as mother.
LEGAL CONFUSION
Real
mother: If both the women (1) one who carries the other woman’s progeny in her womb and (2) the woman who gets the child
delivered by another woman, are working
women, who should get the maternity
leave, first woman, second woman or both. Unfortunately the courts are keeping
quite on this matter.
Pre-natal
leave: Pre-natal maternity leave is for the wellbeing of pregnant woman and
the child in her womb. Why should, an
adopting woman or women receiving surrogate child be entitled to pre-natal
leave, when she is not carrying the pregnancy, requiring rest and relaxation.
Adopting
children older than six months: Even if we assume for the sake of argument,
that maternity leave is for child care and not the for care of women who
delivered the baby, whether maternity leave should be given to a woman who
adopts, a child who is more than six months old. Because the maternity leave
has to be availed, for twelve weeks (for industrial employees) or six months
(for government employees) has to start at least at the time of child birth and
end by the time the child attains three months or six months of age as the case
may be.
Death
of child: In case of a natural maternity, the woman is eligible for full
leave of 12 weeks, even if the child dies, during this 12 weeks/ six months.
The courts are not clear, about maternity leave if the adopted or surrogate
child dies during this 12 weeks period.
Medical
benefits: Whether the woman adopting a child or receiving child through
surrogacy is eligible for medical benefits associated with maternity, without
having a medical condition to qualify for the same.
Medical
benefit for woman who is not your employee: Whether medical benefits
associated with maternity can be extended to the woman who is not employed in
your organization, but she carries the pregnancy and delivers the baby to
fulfil the aspiration of your female employee.
How
about working men: Historically maternity benefit is given only to working
women and not working men, by assuming that it is the working women who have to
deal with their health and medical conditions arising out of pregnancy and
child delivery. If the woman who adopt a child or get a child through surrogacy
can be given maternity benefit, why not extend it to working men who want to
have a child through adoption and surrogacy.
Equality
before law: There are lot of working men, not having children for various
reasons. Should they not be given the maternity benefit for becoming fathers
either through adoption or through surrogacy, failing which the constitutional
right of equality before law becomes meaningless?
Women
in industrial establishments: Whether the benefits from above judgments can be extended to working women in industrial establishment is a puzzle left
to the wisdom of every individual. Legally speaking, both the judgments mentioned above are not applicable to industrial establishments and they are
applicable only to government department employees. The court should have extended
this judgement to women employed in industrial establishments also, in order
avoid hearing another case on the same subject.
Missing
link of humanism: Courts are not aware, why any woman agrees to carry in
her womb by risking her life and dignity, the baby of and for another woman. Only
the women from marginalised sections of the society will take up this job due
to compelling circumstances. It is true that no one represented such
marginalised women in the above cases, but it would have been fair if courts
had looked at this matter.

No comments:
Post a Comment